Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guillaume Dasquié


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 00:13, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Guillaume Dasquié

 * – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete No notability proved. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 14:10, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. The template needed for refs to show was missing. I fixed that. Seems notable though I would like to see more refs like secondary sources. This AfD is a bit premature given the existing refs; under WP:AGF, they should be verified as inapplicable if someone wants to AfD. --JustaHulk (talk) 14:38, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Yes, it needs secondary sources, but there are several on the French version of the page (as well as quite a bit more content), so it passes the multiple independent sources test. Rigadoun (talk) 19:34, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Being sued for libel by Khalid bin Mahfouz would be enough for me, but there's also his detention and questioning about his sources by French domestic intelligence, as reported by Le Monde, Libération, La Croix, and Reporters Without Borders. --Paularblaster (talk) 22:31, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. per Paularblaster. —dima/talk/ 03:12, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Refs were there all along to establish notability - just needed a reflist. You should check things like that before nominating for deletion. Phil Bridger (talk) 15:02, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. To me his notability is well demonstrated by the French-language wiki page.  --Lockley (talk) 21:41, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. The notability is a non-issue here.  (jarbarf) (talk) 05:12, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable. Everyking (talk) 08:07, 24 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.