Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guillem Rodríguez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 07:30, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Guillem Rodríguez

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY. Spanish 3rd and 4th levels are not fully-pro. BlameRuiner (talk) 07:53, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:17, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:17, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:17, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone  11:08, 24 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 14:51, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per norm. Club played are not fully professional. Duke of London (talk) 16:47, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete has not played at the fully professional level. The fact that anyone who has played at the fully professional level on that detail alone is considered default notable is in my view a far too broad level of inclusion, but this person clearly does not even meet that absurdly broad criteria.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:57, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete :The player has not played at fully professional level and thus fails GNG. Indianfootball98 (talk) 02:34, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails all relevant guidelines for footballers and no guarantee that they will ever be notable Spiderone  16:51, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Govvy (talk) 15:59, 29 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.