Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guillermo Cazenave


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 13:38, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Guillermo Cazenave

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is part of a large (self?)-promotional crosswiki spamming campaign, most of it in the Spanish language Wikipedia, but also in the English and French ones. The article on Cazenave in the Spanish Wikipedia was deleted two months ago (see Spanish Village Pump and my user page from October 2008 for more information. Six different user accounts were created in the Spanish Wikipedia at different times with the sole purpose of creating articles on Guillermo Cazenave and all his relatives (including great-great-grandparents) and musical works, sort of like a walled garden network of closely related articles. When one of these accounts was blocked by an admin, hours or even minutes later another account was created with the same or very similar plans. One of the user names is Astralweb, who also registered under the same name in the English Wikipedia. Astralweb is the name of Cazenave's music label and website. Sabbut (talk) 22:41, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 18 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Having read the article, I cannot help but notice that it makes multiple claims to notability, including as a recorded artist and composer, and as a published author. It would appear that these claims need merely to be confirmed, and attested by independent objective sources, for the article to be eminently suitable.  I restrain myself from comment on the nomination itself, as I am trying hard to assume good faith.  Keep, subject to sourcing. -- Jubelum (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 09:17, 18 December 2008 (UTC).
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The label he is with is his own creation (compare the infobox to the external links). Mgm|(talk) 09:35, 22 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete No substantial coverage to indicate notability per guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:20, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. - Mgm|(talk) 09:35, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. --Bobak (talk) 19:30, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 23 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.