Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guillermo J. Tearney


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Curbon7 (talk) 23:48, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Guillermo J. Tearney

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No evidence of significant independent coverage of this scientist. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine and Massachusetts.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  20:51, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. No evidence of significant independent coverage with 7 papers with over 1000 cites? Pull the other one. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC).
 * @Xxanthippe what does "pull the other one" mean? S0091 (talk) 22:14, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Try Google. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC).


 * Keep. Bad nomination; the claim that there was no evidence of coverage in the nomination statement tells more about the nominator's lack of WP:BEFORE than about the subject, because coverage was not hard to find. Beyond the pass of WP:PROF already discussed above, he passes #C3 (Fellow of National Academy of Inventors) and #C5 (named professorship at Harvard). None of these notability criteria depend on independence of coverage. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:27, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn Apparently I got this one wrong. Apologies. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:44, 17 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.