Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guillermo Pineda


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. There was also substantial copyvio of https://guillermopineda.com/research/ – also authored by the subject – and so this deletion could also be considered under WP:CSD in addition to the consensus here. Complex / Rational 14:17, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Guillermo Pineda

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

A CV-type autobiography with minimal sourcing. Whether as a businessperson, an academic or as a political adviser, I am not seeing evidence that the subject has attained biographical notability here. The Prensa Libre Q&A item (2011) is closest to a 3rd party source on his teaching role, and I don't see inclusion in a 30-under-30 list as sufficient. There are a couple of academic papers (as LGP Rodas) but these appear insufficient to demonstrate academic notability. AllyD (talk) 11:57, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Businesspeople,  and Guatemala. AllyD (talk) 11:57, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Advisor to the Deputy Minister of xyz is not a notable position. This is a resume for a political staffer, basically a regular office job. I'm not seeing notability. Oaktree b (talk) 14:25, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: I dont see notability per GNG and there is no evidence for notability per WP:NPROF. --hroest 10:52, 17 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.