Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guinness Kumar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  19:46, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Guinness Kumar

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No indication of notability. Holds "records" in a book that also has records for "oldest person to rotate each hand in a different direction." The Guinness record was suggested by himself, it was not an existing record. ... disco spinster   talk  16:11, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ...  disco spinster   talk  16:11, 20 October 2020 (UTC)


 * delete More guinness garbage. It's easy enough to buy your way into their "records" that it's pretty meaningless wrt notability. Praxidicae (talk) 16:40, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: fails WP:GNG ChunnuBhai (talk) 16:54, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose: I oppose the deletion he holds Guinness records and 11 incredible book of records. Anyone can create a record in Guinness with only their hardwork. Better seo for him is there too — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.68.74.158 (talk) 16:30, 20 October 2020 (UTC)  (Moved to discussion area and properly formatted) davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  17:49, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment: See also Draft:Guinness Kumar written a few days earlier by the same editor, .  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  17:51, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TNT and WP:MILL. His achievements are made up in a day, and the article is terribly written and formatted. Bearian (talk) 19:48, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Most of his so-called records are Fastest Backward Brain cycle rides - the difference is location! I think by the end of the year he may get 3 more. This is not what shows notability of the person in my opinion. Fails WP:GNG also as the coverage is only related to the records. Less Unless (talk) 14:54, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose: no need of deletion here, he achieved those records and name — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vishnuvkt999 (talk • contribs)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.