Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guitar (song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was it appears the nom has withdrawn the nomination by voting keep. Non-admin closure. Whsitchy 16:28, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Guitar (song)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

As stated in the "article" - this is rumor. I can find no source about any future release as a single. Looks like WP:CRYSTAL to me and based on the creator's User Talk Page there is a history of article creations that have been deleted for non-notability and lack of sources. - eo 17:07, 31 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - The article definitly fails WP:CRYSTAL. -- Tλε Rαnδоm Eδι  τ  оr   17:09, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Rumor and not fact does not belong on Wikipedia per WP:CRYSTALUser: (talk • contribs • count ) 17:11, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 *  Snow delete and break its strings Keep even the album is redlinked. Proof of existence shown. Whsitchy 17:36, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Decoratrix 18:02, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete with all due haste.!!! &mdash; Gaff ταλκ 19:31, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - ^^^ [url]http://www.prince.org[/url] look at the Guitar arcticle, theres even been a video filmed - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rumandraisin (talk • contribs) 15:20, 31 May 2007
 * Comment That is a fan site, not the official site, so it is not a valid source. Whsitchy 19:38, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - see WP:CRYSTAL. Tim  V.B. { critic &amp; speak } 23:52, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment www.3121.com (Princes OFFICIAL SITE) states it to be the first single — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rumandraisin (talk • contribs) 06:47, June 1, 2007
 * Comment Please sign next time with ~ . Changing vote per new evidence. Whsitchy 15:52, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. At least in its current state, it doesn't make any unverified predictions; the two sources cited seem official enough (i.e. not fansite speculation), and as for notability, Prince is certainly notable enough that any release of his is notable. If this gets deleted, it will just be re-created in a few months, with someone having to take the trouble of entering tedious infobox information again. Rigadoun (talk) 17:27, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Change to Keep - as long as proper sources are shown and the "rumored to be a single" language is removed from the article, this should stay. I see the article heading in that direction and this is a good thing. - eo 19:19, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. It is officially the first single to be released soon. Andrew Eng 20:41, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep due to already being out in some form. Zeality 15:32, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.