Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guldasta-e-Rahmat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete the whole shebang. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Guldasta-e-Rahmat

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Could be self-promotion. Article on author of this work, Rehmat Aziz Chitrali, has been deleted already. Only reference or link is a suspect "article" from something called the Dardistan Times, which mentions "citizen journalists". Joel7687 (talk) 19:08, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because they have similar text, the same author (article and the subject works), and the same lack of reliable sources:

--Joel7687 (talk) 19:12, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:45, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:46, 13 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Delete I don't see any reliable sources for this article, except perhaps the one from the Dardistan Times. If the author doesn't meet WP:CREATIVE, under most circumstances neither does the author's book. NJ Wine (talk) 00:42, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → B  music  ian  00:18, 27 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete all - fairly obscure books of poetry, subject to re-creation if someone can find reliable reviews. Bearian (talk) 21:27, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.