Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gulista Aalija


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 09:16, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Gulista Aalija

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

CSD tag was removed. Taking to AfD instead. This article does not prove why the subject is notable.  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   12:04, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   12:07, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.   Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   12:07, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   12:07, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   12:07, 6 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete & author given a level 3 for removing speedy. for (talk)  18:27, 6 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete for failing WP:BASIC and no evidence of meeting WP:ENT. Wow, this editor gets nothing but bad news. Shame on him for thinking a sourced stub article about a person simply being an actor could ever possibly be seen as being an assertion of notability. Perhaps he can be encouraged to build his articles as drafts in a userspace sandbox rather that hoping or expecting the others might improve his works.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 19:08, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi (and other reviewing admins), I have a reasonable, well-founded suspicion the article's creator is only here to promote friends/colleagues/proteges, many of whom are likely not notable. See also . This article's creator is definitely engaging in sockpuppetry/meatpuppetry. I have more details, I just haven't gotten around to slapping them into an SPI yet. Check out this article's logs for some of the details. That article had to be salted because this guy and his friends kept trying to make Hira Thind an article despite community consensus. The fact that he's recreated the Gulista Aalija article after I speedied it, just underscores that he's only here to do his own thing. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh, and see also Articles for deletion/Hira Thind Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:53, 6 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as still by far nothing for any notability at all, quite vague regarding information and simply overall not acceptable yet. SwisterTwister   talk  01:39, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of notability. No sign of significant coverage in reliable sources. B E C K Y S A Y L E S  07:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.