Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gullibility

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty 05:30, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

Gullibility
Entire article is composed of a dicdef and examples of the dicdef. jglc | t | c 8 July 2005 20:23 (UTC)


 * Move to Wiktionary. As original author and new to the pedia world, I was not aware of the Wiktionary. Sorry for messing this great site up.   I also believe that the "I heard gullibility wasn't in Wiktionary!" image is an excellent examble of Gullibility (with humor).  July 12, 2005
 * Move to Wiktionary. Karol July 8, 2005 22:03 (UTC) Delete. Karol 06:04, July 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete dicdef - and its first statement is false 'gullability is an adjective' no it's not - it is an abstract noun! --Doc (?) 9 July 2005 09:25 (UTC)
 * delete dicdef with incorrect definition —Tokek 9 July 2005 17:35 (UTC)
 * Delete, if only so people can do the "I heard gullibility wasn't in Wikipedia!" jokes... but seriously, folks, dicdef. Dcarrano July 9, 2005 18:21 (UTC)
 * Wiktionary doesn't want this rubbish when it has adequate gullible and gullibility articles already. Please choose other courses of action. Uncle G 02:18, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.

motion to have the contents of this article say "I can't believe you fell for that!!" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blahblah909 (talk • contribs) 03:17, 7 December 2008 (UTC)