Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gulyani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 17:57, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Gulyani

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Possible hoax: Gulyani is a surname, including of the page creator. There are no references to indicate it is also a tribe. Google scholar returns no results for such a tribe Melcous (talk) 13:07, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 01:53, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:50, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:50, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:20, 27 August 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete no notability. Creator should have provided a single source to prove it as a tribe. Umais Bin Sajjad (talk) 05:01, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:44, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. No indication that this is in any way real, especially considering Melcous's point about the author's surname being the same as the tribe name. No references, no google hits, no notability. --Cagepanes (talk) 05:11, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - I've actually been attempting to find these kind of articles and attempt to improve them but my searches found no signs of improvement here. Feel free to restart once sources and information are better! SwisterTwister   talk  06:50, 10 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.