Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gumb


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:55, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Gumb

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipedia is not for neologisms nor for stuff made up one day. Contested PROD. — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 06:13, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Obviously made-up, I gritted my teeth and Googled to double-check that there is no evidence of anyone actually using this acronym. Ben Kidwell (talk) 07:53, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Like the Yeti, no evidence of existence. --  李博杰   | —Talk contribs email 09:57, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 12:37, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails being anything remotely interesting. - Warthog Demon  15:36, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  -- Joe Chill (talk) 16:20, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, made up at school one day. J I P  | Talk 16:23, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Appears to be a hoax. Even if it where real it probably belongs in a dictionary rather than encyclopedia. Pit-yacker (talk) 18:30, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per everybody above. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 20:04, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Where are the references/sources to justify notability? Answer: there is none. Jolenine  ( Talk  -  My Contribs ) 21:00, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete An acronym isn't notable because two human beings like to use it. --JamesAM (talk) 06:18, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, unsourceable neologism, violates WP:V. -- Kinu t /c  03:05, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.