Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gumday


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 07:36, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Gumday

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced article about a non-notable web site. I am unable to find any reliable sources. - MrX 00:07, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  00:13, 3 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - Unsourced article about a website that has essentially no content. See []. I could not find a single source other than the website itself. Fails both WP:INTERNET AND WP:COMPANY --Crunch (talk)
 * Delete major failure of WP:WEB. Pitiful Alexa rank of 2,127,515 confirms this is very, very non-notable. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  12:36, 3 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Andrew, please keep your opinions to yourself regarding Alexa if you are not a web developer. You'd know why otherwise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tebryne (talk • contribs) 13:41, 3 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:Web, no assertion of notability and no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Could have been speedy deleted per WP:CSD. Evident WP:Conflict of interest by article's creator, following quick web search for creator's account name and website name. Captain Conundrum (talk) 12:33, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.