Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gumpul


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:G11 too slakr  \ talk / 01:16, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Gumpul

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to fail our notability guidelines. There is a certain amount presence on social media, much of it seemingly written by somebody with the same name as the article's creator, but there is a shortage of independent coverage. The website itself seems to be based on WordPress. The logo was copyvio (uploader took somebody else's image, cropped out a copyright notice, and added "Gumpul.com" to the bottom), so I removed it. bobrayner (talk) 22:06, 23 June 2014 (UTC) bobrayner (talk) 22:06, 23 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - I'm not seeing notability Bali88 (talk) 02:01, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello Sir,..

Gumpul is a independent site the content is not created by it's owner but by users across the globe you can notify the 20000 face book likes for brand "gumpul". it is notable Specially in India. yo can't deny it im not advertising about the site here i just wrote about a brand. deleting is not wise decision, Alexa's Rank is a proof to say that it has notability, as well Gumpul also got Voted by number of users on Top ten's " list of top 10 classified sites " and got 7 most desirable classified site in india the two sources are can't be manipulate by owners.


 * it has notability Not require to delete — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anil kumar kanneboina (talk • contribs) 07:06, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
 * It may help your argument if you add sources to the article. The company's facebook page, etc. are not considered reliable sources. Are there news articles about the company? Do you know how to do inline sources? Bali88 (talk) 01:26, 26 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:40, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:40, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:40, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:40, 24 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - I don't see the significant coverage in independent reliable sources that would establish notability. Random top ten sites are not reliable sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whpq (talk • contribs)
 * The top tens site is user-generated. It was discussed (and rejected) recently at the reliable sources noticeboard. bobrayner (talk) 05:35, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.