Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gundisalvus of Lagos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗ plicit  08:46, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Gundisalvus of Lagos

 * – ( View AfD View log )

no evidence of notability. . Even if we were to consider all RC saints notable, he is not yet a Saint.,  DGG ( talk ) 07:40, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 09:22, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 09:22, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 09:22, 11 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep: Passes WP:GNG I think. The first two sources provide WP:SIGCOV; additionally, there are a number of books about him on his WorldCat entry. Curbon7 (talk) 09:34, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes WP:GNG and although not canonised, he has been beatified. That's enough for notability. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:09, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Canonisation is not a prerequisite for notability. Has significant coverage in multiple secondary sources. RickMorais (talk) 15:08, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Beatified persons not yet Canonized but under consideration for same have plenty of RS coverage almost by definition. Jclemens (talk) 22:06, 11 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.