Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gunnerkrigg Court


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Babajobu 04:43, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Gunnerkrigg Court
A webcomic, found here with no Alexa rank. A google search brings up just under 70 links, the only iota of notability is a singular blog posting by Eric Burns. For me, this isn't enough, just because Eric Burns likes something doesn't mean it's automatically notable, notability isn't derived from his tastes. Just for comparison, one of the local bars in Scarborough gets over 100 links on Google. - Hahnchen 23:58, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per vanispamcruftisement. Royboycrashfan 00:30, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per that word that royboycrashfan likes using.Blnguyen 01:41, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * If I like it too can it be notable? No? Aw. Delete. A drian L amo ··  02:14, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Eric Burns take on it does carry weight with me. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 03:07, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - Yeah, I know that Eric Burns carrys some weight in the webcomics community which is why I mentioned it. But it's also that it was only a single blog posting by him that I found, had I found multiple ones I probably wouldn't have nominated it.  I mean, I think he's blogged about me and wikipedia before, and I'm certainly not notable. - Hahnchen 07:32, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't think he's right all the time, but his instincts are good. I agree with him on this one. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 12:37, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Royboycrashfan. --Kinu 03:56, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, does not meet WP:WEB guidelines. -- Dragonfiend 05:35, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Abe Dashiell. Dread Lord C y b e r S k u l l ✎☠ 07:17, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Abe Dashiell. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  07:59, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:WEB and WP:VSCA. Zunaid 13:02, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable webcomic and vanispamcruftisment. --Ter e nce Ong (恭喜发财) 14:20, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per WP:WEB.--Isotope23 17:00, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable. --Karnesky 22:34, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Avi 18:39, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable. HotWings 01:16, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Ruby 01:29, 15 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.