Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gunston Jolly Rodgers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:55, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Gunston Jolly Rodgers

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Despite getting lost and appearing in the papers, this dog is not notable enough for an encyclopedia article. Per WP:NOTNEWS, "Articles about items in the news are only considered encyclopedic if they are verifiably of significant lasting and historical interest and impact." This story is not. Contested PROD. JohnCD (talk) 13:48, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Wikipedia is not for news. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 14:05, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete long, rambling, one-sourced, original research article. Fails WP:GNG.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 18:28, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete That was a little painful to read due to formatting/style. Not news, doesn't seem to pass GNG either.  Pick one, but even if it was written properly, would not be notworthy enough for inclusion as no lasting impact.  P HARMBOY  ( TALK ) 20:02, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as a newspaper article featuring a non-notable subject. Alexius08 (talk) 01:54, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nope, we're still not a newspaper last I checked.  JBsupreme (talk) 05:17, 5 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.