Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guntupalem


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) v/r - TP 00:22, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Guntupalem

 * – ( View AfD View log )

not notable Night of the Big Wind (talk) 20:21, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  —  Beloved  Freak  00:46, 8 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep per our usual practice with villages. Phil Bridger (talk) 15:54, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * If the article is to be kept, it should also be improved big time... Night of the Big Wind (talk) 16:15, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep this is far from the worst Indian village article I've ever seen (at least this one is written in coherent English and doesn't glorify the local taxi driver; if you think I'm kidding...). It does need some work, but precedent seems to be to keep articles on any inhabited place.  Until there's some agreement otherwise, I don't see any reason to treat this differently than a town in, say, the US, ergo it should be kept. The Blade of the Northern Lights  ( 話して下さい ) 19:19, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. All villages are generally held to be notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:54, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per longstanding convention, all population centers are considered inherently notable.--Oakshade (talk) 20:50, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.