Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gurglebean

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 11:30, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Gurglebean
Vanity. Ganymead 06:21, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete – speedily, if possible. Vanity or just plain nonsense. --MarkSweep 06:38, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, article as it stands is un-encyclopaedic, possible personal attack. Megan1967 08:44, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, sounds like a threat from a psychopath, but that's just my opinion. --Sn0wflake 18:30, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - it's been a too long a day to see rubbish like this Brookie 19:40, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete #3, vandalism. Wyss 21:03, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)