Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gurinder Seagal (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per consensus. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:20, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Gurinder Seagal
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of a musician which makes and sources no claim of notability per WP:NMUSIC -- as written, it literally just asserts that he exists, and is sourced entirely to passing namechecks of his existence in media blurbs about a collaborator of his, rather than to substantive coverage about him. Wikipedia is not a free PR platform on which every musician is automatically entitled to an article just because he exists -- reliable source coverage, supporting a proper claim of notability rather than mere existence, is required for the musician to earn a Wikipedia article. First version was about the same person, but was written and sourced differently enough that I don't consider this immediately speediable as a recreation of deleted content — but it's still in no way a keepable article in this form either. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 19:14, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete ... again. He should check back when he hits the big time. Legacypac (talk) 19:17, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:44, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:44, 10 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as still nothing better for the applicable notability, Delete again. Notifying 1st AfDers and .  SwisterTwister   talk  04:49, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above - Nothing's changed since 2014..... He wasn't notable then and he's not notable now, Fails MUSICBIO & GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 08:12, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination, as subject fails relevant guidelines. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:55, 13 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.