Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gurmail Singh (politician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:17, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Gurmail Singh (politician)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable politician, Fails both WP:NPOL and WP:SIGCOV.- TheWikiholic (talk) 09:11, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. TheWikiholic (talk) 09:11, 23 November 2022 (UTC)


 * delete I couldn't find any significant coverage. The only coverage is because of his candidacy, and loss for the seat of member of parliament. Every candidate gets this type of coverage, nothing notable about it. Like the nominator says, subject fails notability criteria for politicians, and due lack of significant coverage, the subject fails general notability criteria as well. —usernamekiran (talk) 09:35, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:46, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:NPOL as he didn't won any general election. Also this doesn't have WP: SIGCOV. The subject is district level president of a political party, which is not a major position. ❯❯❯  Chunky aka Al Kashmiri   (✍️) 05:25, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Sarpanch are the peoples who head the village and they are elected by village-level constitutional body so Sarpanch and district head of any party are not notable positions. He is also a candidate for Lok Sabha election which also doesn't establish notability for him. ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 08:40, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: As above and nom. Also, petition to start a new rule WP:SARPANCH (JK). User4edits (talk) 08:00, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neither local officeholders nor non-winning candidates for higher office are "inherently" notable for that per se, but this is sourced nowhere close to well enough to establish him as a special case of significantly greater notability than the norm for those things. Bearcat (talk) 16:19, 29 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.