Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gurpreet Kaur Chadha (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 23:50, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Gurpreet Kaur Chadha
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A previous similar version of this article was taken to AfD in early October and had gathered several opinions for deletion before it was speedy-deleted as promotional. It has now been reposted so I think this AfD should be seen through to a persisting decision. Repeating my previous view: "The sources are poor and my searches are not finding better. Neither her public activity nor the coverage indicates encyclopaedic notability." AllyD (talk) 16:47, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 16:49, 22 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete still a non-notable low level politician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:30, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: This is all my fault that we are seeing another afd; I shouldn't have speedied previous article. I'm really very sorry!
 * Coming back to afd discussion: Subject has some passing mentions in few reliable sources but those are not what Wikipedia seeks to write an encyclopedia article. We need "substantial" coverage in multiple reliable sources and that exactly is lacking in present case. Subject is an unelected politician, thus fails WP:NPOL, and as for socialite, doesn't have the kind of coverage previously mentioned, thus fails, WP:GNG. Anup   [Talk]  20:04, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:05, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  SST  flyer  12:49, 27 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. The article does not state that she's a holder of a notable political office, but stakes her notability as a politician solely on being a local party organizer. That's not something that gets a person over WP:NPOL, however. Her role with the Punjabi Global Foundation is sourced exclusively to primary sources and a photo of her at a gala event, not to any substantive reliable source coverage about her in that role, so it doesn't assist notability at all. And the other claims here, "actress", "socialite" and "producer", are merely asserted and not even explained or sourced — actress is parked on a blurb about her birthday party which doesn't actually state that she's an actress, and producer is parked on another mere photograph. All of which means that nothing here is a substantive claim of notability at all, and none of the sourcing is adequate to claim WP:GNG. Bearcat (talk) 17:14, 27 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.