Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guru Nanak Public Senior Secondary School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 08:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Guru Nanak Public Senior Secondary School

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable school. Fails WP:NSCHOOL, WP:SIGCOV and WP:ORG.  Peter Ormond &#128172;  22:03, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:09, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:09, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Punjab-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:09, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * - Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd (via summary).
 * --Cewbot (talk) 00:03, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  00:13, 20 December 2021 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  01:44, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete I couldn't find anything about this except for an article about a couple of students that played on a basketball championship team. Which has nothing to do with the school. There isn't any references in the article either. So from what I can tell this clearly fails WP:NORG and other relevant guidelines. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:44, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete No significant coverage of the school, fails WP:GNG. Plus no references, along with being a heavily biased article.Lectrician2 (talk) 01:13, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of significant coverage, lots of mentions online but nothing in any great detail. If this is to be kept then it would need a complete rewrite (or reverting to the one-line stub that it once was) as the current content is WP:G11-level promotion. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:24, 29 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.