Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gurudev R D Ranade


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy deleted as copyright violation. -- nae'blis 02:33, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Gurudev R D Ranade

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Completely unreferenced article about a subject on whom Google finds precious few references, and a quick sample of those found none which are independent and usable. Guy (Help!) 15:44, 2 June 2007 (UTC) 
 * Delete Simply not enough evidence to base an article on, especially considering the figure this man was supposed to be. This would be a poor article even if it was backed up with substantial details from a reliable source. --Tefalstar 15:58, 7 June 2007 (UTC)Tefalstar
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions.   --   &rArr; bsnowball  09:47, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sr13 15:29, 7 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 17:34, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems to be notable. Prominent figure in mysticism, author of books like History of Indian Philosophy : The Creative Period . Needs wikification, definitely.--Dwaipayan (talk) 19:00, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete I wouldnt expect to find ghits, but I think we need something--this is totally unsourced. The career does sound notable, but there has to be some sort of evidence. I support being flerxible for not contemporary non-Western figures, but there has to be something. DGG 03:56, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as a copyright violation of this page. So tagged. Lyrl  Talk C 01:31, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.