Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gurunathanmukadi Sri Ayyappaguru


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Hindu temples in Kerala. The redirect can be challenged at RfD because there is disagreement here between delete and redirect.  Sandstein  13:53, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Gurunathanmukadi Sri Ayyappaguru

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No sources, no indication of Notability. Fails WP:NRELORG. WP:PROD was contested. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 01:51, 8 March 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Delete or redirect? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk &#124; contribs) 02:47, 15 March 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:04, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 01:51, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 01:51, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:NRELORG and WP:GNG. No independent coverage of the temple. No evidence of notability. Venkat TL (talk) 07:44, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of Hindu temples in Kerala: The page lacks sufficient information to indicate notability. A redirect to the list will provide a place to build information. Gusfriend (talk) 10:24, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Support redirect to the list, so if enough sources and information is added there it could be remade in the future. YuriNikolai (talk) 19:09, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I oppose the redirect, this is a totally worthless and unencylopedic entry, clearly made up story for promotion and escape speedy deletion. Venkat TL (talk) 19:27, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
 * what "story"? The page only lists a location exists and says where it is. Are you suggesting the temple is made up? YuriNikolai (talk) 21:03, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
 * @YuriNikolai I was referring to the unsourced legend of the temple, that I and another editor had removed. You can look at the page history. Venkat TL (talk) 07:04, 25 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.