Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gus Khouri


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete Politicians need to be elected to something to be notable and the level of the appointment is also relevant. This individual does not current meet the criteria for inclusion but this can be reviewed in the event that he is elected to something. Spartaz Humbug! 23:05, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Gus Khouri

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

person not notable - as a politician, never nominated to represent party in election Mayumashu (talk) 01:50, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Though I must say that article is remarkably NPOV for one of these candidate bio articles.  So let's delete it but I hope that the author(s) stay to work on other articles.  --JGGardiner (talk) 01:59, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Disagreed. Candidate is now seeking new office. Also, still retains official position with local Party as 'Potential Nomination Contestant' in case of unforeseen circumstances rendering Candidate incapable of seeking office. This title remains until official writ is dropped for the 40th Canadian General Election. My suggestion is to keep. Rest assured that the main author will stay on to work on other articles.--Chillin841 (talk) 02:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I do note that he's still a potential candidate and that he is seeking party office. Nothing is set in stone but, in general, we haven't included candidates for parliament unless they are otherwise notable like, say, Lewis Mackenzie or something happens in the election which makes them notable, like Kevin Potvin or David Oliver.  Usually they go on lists like Liberal Party candidates, 2006 Canadian federal election.  --JGGardiner (talk) 08:37, 1 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.