Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gustaf Göthberg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:40, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Gustaf Göthberg

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doe not meet notability criterias. None of the source are reliable. No independent sources exist which can prove notability. Deleted five times on Swedish WIkipedia due to the same reasons. (t) Josve05a  (c) 11:20, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. (t)  Josve05a  (c) 11:29, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. (t)  Josve05a  (c) 11:30, 30 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete: A young person staying busy, but not a notable one at this time. Hithladaeus (talk) 12:49, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * delete does not meet WP:NPOL LibStar (talk) 16:28, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Has not yet reached notability as a politician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:03, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Strong keep not the strongest merits, but many merits together. J 1982 (talk) 21:59, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Could you link to sources, or policies which proves his merits are worthy of inclution? I know you are from Sweden, as well as I am, and I do have a COI in this issue, however I am forced to ask, since you are the only one so far opposing deletion, and with a strong  !vote, if you have a COI in this Swedish political issue?; The Swedish Wikipedia did not see any notability in this subject to be included, what's different in the English article, or EnWP policies? Certainly not the sources. (t) Josve05a  (c) 22:31, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * strong keep?.it looks like a very weak argument. LibStar (talk) 23:02, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are correct and Göthberg is notable, you will be able to prove it by locating profiles of him in major newspapers and magazines - in any language. Add those articles to the page, sourcing his activities to major media and demonstrating that he has been the subject of in-depth coverage, and editors here will read them and keep the article.E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:55, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, moderately; being active in a Moderate Party is not a valid claim to notability. WP:TOOSOON.E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:TOOSOON. A person does not get a notability freebie just for being active in the youth wing of a political party, especially when that article is relying entirely on his own social media presence for sourcing. When reliable sources cover him in the context of something that actually meets a Wikipedia inclusion standard — such as actually getting elected to a seat in the Riksdag — then he can absolutely come back. Bearcat (talk) 01:34, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for the same reason that Göthberg's article has been deleted four times at the Swedish language version of Wikipedia (see ): the chairs he has held in political organizations aren't important enough. /FredrikT (talk) 10:07, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete This person is not notable. RoadWarrior445 (talk) 06:21, 7 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.