Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gustarvus Lightbourne Sports Complex


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  14:02, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Gustarvus Lightbourne Sports Complex

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Whether we view this complex as a building or as an organization, I don't see the notability guidelines being met, nor do I see them being met under the general guidelines. The place definitely exists. It has own Facebook page and does receive mention in the Turks and Caicos press. But those mentions are merely in passing -- that the place is being used as a hurricane shelter, or as a site for voter registration, or the meeting point for a march. I found nothing of substance about the place itself. The article can't be converted into a redirect to the person it is named after, because that person doesn't have an article here. Conceivably, it might be made into a redirect to Providenciales (specifically, the section on tourist attractions). But even that is problematic. Not only does the Providenciales article not mention the place, it isn't even mentioned on the tourist site linked in that article (which can be seen at http://visittci.azurewebsites.net/providenciales/things-to-do/attractions ]. In all, deletion is the best option here. NewYorkActuary (talk) 00:58, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 01:00, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 01:00, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 01:00, 9 December 2017 (UTC)


 * In favour of deletion for the article is to brief and stubby; no notability or significance displayed. Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 04:36, 9 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.