Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gustave Lefebvre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Nomination withdrawn. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 06:31, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Gustave Lefebvre

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:COATRACK. This is not a biography of Gustave Lefebvre. AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:03, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn by nominator. The coatrack has been replaced by an actual biography of Lefebvre. Though sourcing seems sparse, and we may well end up with little more than a stub, WP:GNG seems to have been met. AndyTheGrump (talk) 06:25, 3 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Archaeology, Africa,  and Egypt. AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:03, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and France. Shellwood (talk) 21:53, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 * ? Nomination is unclear. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:42, 2 July 2024 (UTC).
 * Keep but replace content. I agree that the article in its nominated state was a WP:COATRACK. I have stubbed it back down to a single sentence with his birth and death dates and occupation (the state in which it was created) but added three published sources about his life. I think that's enough for WP:GNG, and WP:TNT would only have applied if there were no valid version to revert to, not true in this case. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:43, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep' following David's improvements. It's also worth noting that the article was created as a plain stub and the coatracky stuff was only added later. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 06:06, 3 July 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.