Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gustavo Costa Medeiros


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 16:24, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Gustavo Costa Medeiros

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per this discussion at WP:AN, this article had a CSD tag since 2019, but never appeared in CAT:CSD. Sending to AfD as procedural nomination - I suspect this person is non-notable, but simply checking. I am neutral. Black Kite (talk) 00:14, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Black Kite (talk) 00:14, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:22, 24 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete "...currently in his second residence in psychiatry..." Folks this early in their career are almost never notable.  The publication record looks nowhere near WP:NPROF, and I see no other signs of notability.  Russ Woodroofe (talk) 13:20, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete "... too early, his highest cited paper has 14 citations. --hroest 18:27, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TOOSOON, WP:PROF, and WP:NOTINHERITED. Far too early in his career, he fails the professor test. Much of the claim to notability rests on other Nobel Prizes by (late) co-workers. Many alumni of my school have won the Nobel Prize, too. Bearian (talk) 15:28, 2 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.