Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gustavo S. Oderich


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep. The nominator clearly indicates that they are confused themselves and the decision and rationale to keep the article is overwhelming. (non-admin closure) Celestina007 (talk) 01:23, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Gustavo S. Oderich

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not sure if this vascular and endovascular surgeon qualifies GNG Citterz (talk) 16:29, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Citterz (talk) 16:29, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:31, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:31, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:32, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:32, 10 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep A notable vascular and endovascular surgeon who serves as a professor and chief of vascular and endovascular surgery, and is the director of the Advanced Endovascular Aortic Program at McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center and Memorial Hermann Health System. He also served as chair of vascular and endovascular division at the Mayo Clinic which can also be counted towards his notability. Woofhilt (talk) 16:46, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep for a surgeon with 10k citations on GS and 20+ articles with 100 or more citations, this person is clearly notable per WP:NPROF#1. Please do WP:BEFORE, this is a pretty clear cut case. --hroest 19:12, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. 6577 citations on Scopus and an h-index of 42, and pretty clearly an academic so GNG is irrelevant. JoelleJay (talk) 20:16, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep: as per above citations. --Whiteguru (talk) 00:08, 11 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.