Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gutbucket (album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. We're evidently not going to get a solid answer here - we can't relist forever. &mdash; Joseph Fox 09:47, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Gutbucket (album)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

non-notable comp —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:19, 30 July 2011 (UTC)


 * While it might not be a very famous album in its own right, the tracks on it were by musicians who (mostly) went on to have successful careers, and issued more famous albums. I would keep it (and other similar compilation albums). SemperBlotto (talk) 20:55, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Response Cf. with WP:MUSIC and WP:NOTABLE: notability isn't inherited. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:02, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * What SemperBlotto wrote: keep !!! StefanWirz (talk) 10:18, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. One of several notably innovative and influential budget priced samplers issued in the UK in the late 1960s - here.  Low-priced "sampler albums", designed to showcase new material and expand the market for new music among a budget-conscious (i.e. young) audience, are a quite different concept from retrospective compilations of old material, and the budget-priced samplers issued in late 1960s Britain were an important (if somewhat ephemeral) part of the zeitgeist of the time and place.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 09:53, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Response Even if samplers at large were important (and this has not been established), you still need to show that this sampler was important. Can you provide sources to establish the notability of this album? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 11:03, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm willing to accept that the specific notability of this particular album is debatable, although some sources suggest that the Liberty series (of which this was the first) was one of the first to appear (along with the CBS and Island series). But, I would contend not only that late 1960s UK budget samplers are a very notable and important genre as a whole, but that the Liberty series is an important sub-set of that.  It would be better to maintain this article (and also Son of Gutbucket) rather than attempting to merge the two, simply because most searches would look for one or other title rather than, say, Liberty Records UK budget-priced sampler albums (1960s).  Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:42, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Response Simply find reliable, third-party sources that substantiate this claim. They can be added to this article or to List of Liberty Records sampler albums or to Sampler album depending on how many sources there are and how much material you can reasonably get out of them. I would reckon there will be very little. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:59, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 21:01, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  —  Gongshow  Talk 18:43, 2 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Delete as completely unsourced. No assertion of notability, no verification of any kind. No prejudice against recreation if reliable sources can be found and applied to the page. Might be some sources, I'm not finding anything significant. BusterD (talk) 11:20, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cerejota (talk) 06:29, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Joseph Fox 17:19, 21 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. — Status  &#x7B;talkcontribs  19:38, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.