Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guy Goma (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. JForget 03:26, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Guy Goma
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Only notable for one event WP:BLP1E. Although the incident received media coverage, there is no notability beyond the single event. There hasn't been a update of this guy in years, indicating WP:RECENTISM-Coasttocoast (talk) 04:48, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Notable and well sourced. Badagnani (talk) 05:59, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - the interview incident led to a brief period of fame, there's plenty of coverage, and the article is well-sourced. No reason to delete.--Michig (talk) 07:14, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - A well written article, well sourced and comprehensive. Edward Vielmetti (talk) 18:21, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, consider renaming to reflect the event which is already the main focus of the article. There is currently no separate article about the event, which is notable enough for an article. Cassandra 73 (talk) 20:39, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * We may as well Keep, but I don't real all that strongly about it. -J.S (T/C/WRE) 01:11, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Apparently this story is still occasionally mentioned in the media, as recent as September 2009:, , . ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 01:19, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * This one was only two weeks ago - Cassandra 73 (talk) 10:13, 27 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - though maybe consider Cassandra 73's suggestion. And I know it was a repeat from 2006 but Guy Goma was on the TV no less than five minutes ago, which is the reason I came to the article. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 23:43, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm exactly the same as AnemoneProjectors and came here because I also just saw him in the repeat of Big Fat Quiz of the Year 2006 and came to the Wiki article. ZX81  talk  00:10, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not opposed to renaming in theory, but I can't think of anything that wouldn't make the article harder to find. -J.S (T/C/WRE) 03:47, 28 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep for the exact same reasons as before: "Notable and verifiable, everything is referenced. I don't think the transcript is appropriate, however." -- MisterHand  (Talk to the Hand|Contribs) 15:59, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.