Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guzema Fine Jewelry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  13:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Guzema Fine Jewelry

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The article cites trade publications and a Forbes contributor article. Some of the sources are about the person for interviews. I think this article is promotional and we need to demonstrate that it is notable per WP:NCORP. A G11 by a previous reviewer was declined so I will leave this for the community to decide. Lightburst (talk) 17:17, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Fashion,  and Ukraine. Lightburst (talk) 17:19, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep per good reliable sources and significant coverage in Elle, Vogue and local magazines and news papers. Added some sources --Assirian cat (talk) 08:35, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Blocked for spamming. MER-C 09:47, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Vogue: The First Lady of Ukraine Dressed With Pride to Meet President Biden passing mention].
 * Elle Elle Style Awards 2017: winners and party passing mention
 * We have a few routine announcements and interviews or interest articles about the Ukrainian owner.like this and articles about the founder but I do not think we get to the kind of RS needed for a notable company.
 * V$ Bloggy looking site with no editorial overbite that I can see.
 * I am happy to withdraw if I am wrong. Lightburst (talk) 13:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete: Fails GNG and NCORP, nothing found in article or BEFORE that meets WP:SIRS, addressing the subject directly and indepth by independent reliable sources.  // Timothy :: talk  23:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep The Forbes article is by a contributor but I see no evidence that the article is not independent. The National Jeweler and the mentions in articles in the New York Times should suffice as English language sources. Since I cannot read the Ukrainian source I am taking on faith that those are substantial. Lamona (talk) 02:55, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Forbes contributor articles are red-lined on perennial reliable sources WP:FORBESCON. Lightburst (talk) 22:18, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen&times; &#9742;  13:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep in addition to the mentioned references I’m adding the following good sources with significant independent coverage. Here is a good long read in KyivPost, a Space Magazine publication representing the jewellery industry showed the company in depth here pages 61-63 . Also, here is a success story in the local top newspaper and TV channel ICTV and here is an in-depth coverage from the other local newspaper  while here is the in-depth coverage from a business-oriented and highly reliable in Ukraine AIN.ua news site . Here is also a good coverage from Vogue in English . Also I’ve found a significant coverage in Polish version of Glamour . Also worth mentioning is Vogue Singapore  and L’officiel Mexico   --Riva Pola97 (talk) 17:34, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Blocked for spamming. MER-C 09:39, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. In addition, the topic of this article is the company - references that focus on a product (reviews, mentions, etc) or interview a company exec (e.g. a puff profile) do not establish notability (unless the reference goes on to provide in-depth Independent Content about the company- which they never do). For example, this in Kyiv Post is a puff profile on the founder based entirely on information provided by the founder and containing no in-depth information on the company - fails CORPDEPTH and ORGIND. Or this in cn.ua mentions the company briefly in passing and contains no in-depth Independent Content about the company, also failing CORPDEPTH and ORGIND. Or similarly this in Vogue, same reasons as above. If Valeryi is notable in her own right, then write an article about her, but these references do not establish notability of the company and I'm unable to identify any references that do.  HighKing++ 12:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.