Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gwendolyn Hung


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. PhilKnight (talk) 11:39, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Gwendolyn Hung

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested PROD. Does not meet WP:ENTERTAINER. She has not had significant roles in multiple notable films, television, stage performances, and other productions (the reference lists her in four films, none of which appear to be particularly notable), does not have a large fan base or a significant "cult" following (or else there would be more available sources) and has not made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment (no evidence of that at all). She does not meet the primary notability criteria, significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, either. I do admit a possibility of foreign language sources, but I doubt it given the nature of her career, although I open to changing my mind if I see that they are available. The article itself is basically a wordy summary of her IMDB profile. Cheers, CP 00:53, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. I should note that there is only a single Gnews hit on her, and that's behind a subscription firewall, and so the mention may only be incidental there. RayAYang (talk) 04:13, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.   — bluemask  (talk) 04:32, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions.   -- RayAYang (talk) 05:59, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Google turns up wiki mirrors or sentences with "Gwendolyn" as a noun "hung" as a verb. Google Books reflects the noun verb arrangement as well. I don't know if redirecting to Fireback is a good idea since I doubt the notability of the said movie.-- Lenticel  ( talk ) 06:14, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn. Movingboxes (talk) 08:50, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per above, neither the actress nor the project passes muster.  Utgard Loki (talk) 17:23, 21 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.