Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gwget


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. since there's no sources there's nothing to merge Wizardman  20:15, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Gwget

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 14:11, 22 November 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:17, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge to wget, since this is a GUI for wget --SF007 (talk) 14:32, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Merge to Wget. Ray  Talk 01:20, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to wget along with KGet --Pboyd04 (talk) 05:32, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete unless a single claimed third party source exists to merge. Notability as a stand-alone article requires multiple third party sources. To merge, I'd like to see at least one third party source, otherwise we could be documenting some two hour basement project by a ten year old. We don't know anything reliable about this software to document. Miami33139 (talk) 07:46, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * DO NOT MERGE this has nothing to do with wget, other than wget is a piece of software that this software uses. Third-party software should not merge into the first party's article... it would be the same as if XTreeGold were merged into the MSDOS article, because XTreeGold was a shell on top of DOS. 76.66.194.154 (talk) 08:18, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:52, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Just delete unless third-party sources are found. (Disclaimer: I haven't looked.)  It already has more of a mention in wget than it merits, since it uses wget as an implementation detail.  76.66.194.154's comparison to a merge of XTreeGold into MSDOS might sound overdramatic, but the situation's very similar. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 03:42, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.