Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gynesis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 05:24, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Gynesis

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unnotable term. The book where the term is defined and used(Gynesis: Configurations of Woman and Modernity) may or may not be notable, but the term itself doesn't rate its own article. Herostratus (talk) 04:57, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment discussion listing fixed cab (talk) 05:30, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete yet another gynocentric neologism that fortunately will not catch on. JuJube (talk) 08:20, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * delete as neologism. (The book might be appropriate for an article, however. ISBN 0801417686.   If we had an article about the book, a redirection might be reasonable.)--The very model of a minor general (talk) 10:55, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, though perhaps an article about theoretical reading of the feminine that disrupts the metanarratives of western culture ought to have a round on pages needing translation first. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 13:43, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. ArcAngel (talk) 13:44, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO.--Berig (talk) 18:39, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete This word was a lame clunky American academic attempt to invent a feminine version of jouissance. It never caught on/has never been popular even in the most obscure corner of academia. The French feminist concept of ecriture feminine, and Julia Kristeva's concept of the semiotic are similar, achieved notability, and are already described in the encyclopedia. No need whatsoever for this inelegant and totally unnotable term to have an article.-PetraSchelm (talk) 06:52, 1 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.