Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gypsy (comic book)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  An as  talk? 20:53, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Gypsy (comic book)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

prod contested because who is the author of the comic. But article, while stating who the author is, doesn't indicate anything notable about this particular comic book. In fact, the only thing it states is who the author is. Not everything by a notable author is wiki worthy (that is, worthy of their own article) and since this article doesn't even begin to tell us why it should stay, and it has had sufficient time for someone to tell us why it should, then it should go. In fact, the person who contested the prod didnt' even add to the article. Postcard Cathy 22:00, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * PS If the editors who worked on Pulido's article didn't even bother to include it in his list of work, I wonder how notable it could be????   MMMM NOT VERY NOTABLE!!!!!!!!!!!   STRONG DELETE Postcard Cathy 22:02, 27 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete no evidence of notability. JJL 23:11, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 16:08, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No secondary sources to establish significance. Jay32183 20:03, 30 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.