Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gyrodactylus leptorhynchi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 00:38, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Gyrodactylus leptorhynchi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Move to https://en.wikitionary.org/wiki/Gyrodactylus leptorhynchi. 333-blue 11:06, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems to me that a real species is by definition notable, in that it will appear in books and academic papers. Which it does. I don't see any real question as to notability, but suspect that enquiries need to be made of a relevant WikiProject rather than here (for example if this name does not have wide acceptance yet, etc). JMWt (talk) 12:01, 10 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. Clearly not a dicdef. We have articles on all living species. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:22, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:35, 10 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. Per WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES. Plantdrew (talk) 15:51, 10 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.