Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gyrotonic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep (nomination withdrawn)

Gyrotonic
Has been tagged advert, tone, unencyclopedic, uncat, cleanup and linkless and has twice (!) been prod'd, none of these by me. Perhaps it should be put out of its misery ? I think so. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:54, 16 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. :)  Deli nk 21:14, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete under G11. I don't have the heart to put another box on that page however. hateless 21:36, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
 * withdraw above per Angus' edits. hateless 22:54, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: I must confess that I added all of those cleanup templates, because I was irritated at having my prod summarily removed. It's fairly deserving of most of them, but it does seem somewhat notable, with google returning 184,000 results. Perhaps it could be merged into some other kind of excercise page? Or severely copyedited to reduce it to a less horrid article? Salad Days 21:37, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, I deadvertised it somewhat, added a reference, and remove the nonessential weblinks. I have no idea if a merge with pilates would be justified, but some material seems to treat Gyrotonic as a variant of that. Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:47, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Well done! Salad Days 02:12, 17 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Nomination withdrawn after cleanup: poor research by the nominator. Angus McLellan (Talk) 18:30, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.