Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H-cluster reductions

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep. Kelly Martin 02:55, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)

H-cluster reductions
''This page was nominated for deletion by someone using the IP address 205.188.116.71 but was not put up at VfD. I'm completing the nomination process, but I vote to keep, as mentioned below. --Angr/undefined 21:41, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)''

This article says that some people say yooj for huge. That's not true. Only lazy people say that. That's a mispronunciation, not a dialectal feature. 205.188.116.201 June 14, 2005
 * Speedy keep, no valid grounds for deletion given. As for the linguistically naive statement above, I'm not even going to dignify it with a response. --Angr/undefined 21:07, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * KEEP This shouldn't even be listed here. Lachatdelarue (talk) 21:57, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Looks fine to me. Ambush Commander 22:58, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment WP:NOR I'm not sure where this falls.  Outside of wikimirrors, this appears on one site. I'll admit, though, that this is a narrow field of study that's not likely to see a lot of press.  --Xcali 03:57, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * It's hard to google for because they're not always called "H-cluster reductions". Some people call them "Glide cluster reductions", and some people don't group them together at all, just calling them the "wine-whine merger" and the "yew-hew merger" (or some other set of words that illustrate the point), and some people don't call them by any name at all, but just talk about the loss of /h/ before /w/ and/or /j/. But they're definitely both notable phenomena in the phonology and sociolinguistics of English. The loss of /h/ before /l/, /n/, and /r/ isn't so notable; it's just one of the many sound changes that happened during the course of Middle English. --Angr/undefined 06:24, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete original research. JamesBurns 06:20, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep this is a genuine subject. Maybe it'll never make it to the evening news on tv, but this is an encyclopedia. Bambaiah 13:20, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * I see that another legit article from Category:Phonology has been put on VfD by a user from IP number 205.188.166.xxx &mdash; Votes for deletion/Reduction (linguistics) Bambaiah 05:16, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep Not always called by a consistent name, but if I studied it in an intro linguistics class it belongs here.  --Laura Scudder | Talk 15:41, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .