Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H2Oregon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -- JForget  00:55, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

H2Oregon

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete as per WP:N. Though this article says it is in the middle of expansion, but it clearly fails at WP:Notability. Thousands of such forum exist on the web. Just because of the expansion tag, I am tagging it for AfD otherwise I would tag it for Speedy. --   Niaz  (Talk •  Contribs)  22:15, 15 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. As much as it hurts me to support the deletion of content from Wikipedia, this simply doesn't seem notable.  Of course, I'll change my vote if any references or sources come up; all I could find was a press release written by the group.  Cel  Talk to me  22:22, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:WEB.--Michael WhiteT&middot;C 22:44, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I'm not even sure that this isn't an WP:CSD candidate.  It'd be nice to see sources, but I doubt they're forthcoming.  --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 22:59, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. as per nom. Gwandoya  Talk 23:20, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Simply not notable enough. As the nominator said, there are plenty of forums out there. How is this one any more worthy of inclusion? --clpo13(talk) 06:04, 16 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as per WP:SD and/or WP:SD. – Dream out loud (talk) 19:03, 16 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.