Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HAL Lancer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Aérospatiale SA 315B Lama. Black Kite (t) (c) 02:58, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

HAL Lancer

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Not notable - a minor licence-built variant of the Aérospatiale SA 315B Lama with small differences (two bolt-on rocket pods and an armoured seat) does not really justify a separate article MilborneOne (talk) 22:27, 7 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - Endorse nomination. - BilCat (talk) 22:30, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Not enough differences for a separate article on the Lancer. Specific details on this variant can and should be covered in the SA 315B article.  Looks like a a couple sentences will cover the details, plus about a sentence on operational use, with appropriate references. -fnlayson (talk) 01:40, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not enough of a difference to justify a separate article, merge into Aérospatiale SA 315B Lama. - Ahunt (talk) 02:58, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Aérospatiale SA 315B Lama - The Bushranger Return fire Flank speed 04:38, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge and re-direct to Aérospatiale SA 315B Lama. I was in two minds about doing the same. In the end i chose the easy option as I wanted to get on with other things.Petebutt (talk) 10:19, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Maintain it- It is a modified variant where the basic usage of the vehicle is changed. A clear example of a civilian product that is put to a dual use. Further it currently in mass-production where as the production of Aérospatiale SA 315B Lama have stopped years ago. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.94.143.30 (talk) 15:28, 9 November 2010 (UTC)  — 59.94.143.30 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.