Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HDJ-1000


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. No quorum. causa sui (talk) 23:08, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

HDJ-1000

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Delete. Non-notable product. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 20:28, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * keep or merge Easily mergeable into an article on the line of sony headphones. But this is a current product, and there might be reviews, which would make it independently notable  DGG ( talk ) 20:35, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Being a current product and the existence of reviews does not necessarily make it notable enough for WP. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 03:07, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * What makes a product notable if not significant coverage in reliable sources?--Pontificalibus (talk) 10:19, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately we do not have a notability guide for product - but WP:PRODUCT suggests merging into the manufacturers article - so we have to make a judgement on a case by case basis. Given that there are 100s of 1000s of products out there and the need to avoud SPAM by stealth and to avoid giving one particular product unnecessarily high exposure via WP there is a need to take a hard line on product articles. An article on a pair of headphone? What next an article on a brand of nail polish? Oh, I see that has already happened. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 18:45, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  — frankie (talk) 18:04, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  — frankie (talk) 18:04, 12 September 2011 (UTC)


 * delete or merge fails WP:GNG currently. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:42, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 01:46, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 10:47, 25 September 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.