Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HD 154577


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:14, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

HD 154577

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't seem to meet WP:NASTRO. StringTheory11 (t • c) 00:26, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 24 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete or merge to appropriate list article. I looked carefully at each of the cited sources. This object is not singled out for any special coverage in the sources. It is one of dozens, and in some cases hundreds, of other stars studied. No evidence of significant coverage is provided here, or available, that I can find. This wouldn't pass WP:GNG, nor WP:NASTRO. Cheers, AstroCog (talk) 13:54, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:02, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:03, 1 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep This is an excellent example of WP:NASTRO failure, as explained in this thread. Lots of third party, sourced information allows us to build a perfectly encyclopedic article, without any need of original research, even if no single source is fully devoted to it. -- cyclopia speak! 09:44, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.