Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HD 156279 c


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 07:59, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

HD 156279 c

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NASTRO. Zero journal papers published solely about this planet or it and a small number of others. The only reference I found was the discovery paper, and even that was as part of a batch of new exoplanets. Effectively no popular coverage. No apparent uniquely notable features. Lithopsian (talk) 20:58, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:59, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. I couldn't find sources either. I'm going to go ahead and nominate HD 156279 b for deletion as well as I believe it too has no journal articles covering it or anything beyond trivial coverage. Sam-2727 (talk) 21:16, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agreed on the above points. At best, for low-notability multi-planet systems like this, a single article could cover the properties of the star and its planets. That would be much better than having a separate article on each planet. Aldebarium (talk) 20:19, 16 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.