Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HELIX STUDIOS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jujutacular (talk) 02:33, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

HELIX STUDIOS

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject of the article fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. I can't find the significant coverages in multiple independent reliable sources that establish the subject notability. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 19:34, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 19:40, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 19:40, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 19:40, 31 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Per WP:GNG and WP:COMPANY. Fails both criteria, as no independent secondary reliable sources seem to exist to provide significant coverage and assert any notability. If it weren't for the credible claim of significance that the article seems to barely scrape, I'd say that this article could be A7'd.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   20:16, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails notability with very few reputable sources backing it up. S. Salim (talk) 22:31, 31 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Being the " largest academy studio company in the world" might be a "suitable" assertion of notability if this were instead the biggest studio to create nature films, or anime films, or drama films, or thriller films... but one the largest to manufacture gay "twink" porn? Nope.  I think we can ignore that it is not spoken about in The New York Times, and is instead spoken of in sources that are sullied and refutable. We can ignore coverage and mention in genre sources such as Q-Notes, LGBT Weekly, The Wire, Brow Beat, Big Gay Picture Show, SDGLN, Spin, Tetu (French), Zeit (German), or GGG (German), and let this twink film academy go.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 17:45, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP, not enough in-depth coverage from reliable independent sources.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:12, 8 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.