Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HERCULAN


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Metaltech: Earthsiege.  MBisanz  talk 02:57, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

HERCULAN

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I am completing an unfinished nomination by User:Remurmur. I'm not sure why they thought it should be deleted, but I think it should be deleted because it is an unsourced article about a fictional robot in a computer game that does not assert or demonstrate any notability whatsoever. Reyk YO!  05:33, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete This is terrible. There are no sources, the article is one sentence long, and no notability has been demonstrated.-- 20 08 Ol ymp ian chitchat 08:07, 5 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:07, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Just because it may be poorly written does not consitute an article for deletion. It is notable as a character in Metaltech: Earthsiege. I've added a reference from here. Dipotassitrimanganate (talk) 18:05, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge and delete --> Metaltech: Earthsiege Notable, perhaps, but notable enough to merit it's own article? --Deltwalrus (talk) 18:55, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Metaltech: Earthsiege as a possible search term. Does not warrant a seperate article, unless this game concept has receieved significant, independent, reliable coverage (in which case content can be written in accordance with WP:WAF) Marasmusine (talk) 17:48, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not establish notability through significant coverage of real world context in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. Jay32183 (talk) 23:13, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.