Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HGFS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to VMware. JForget 22:41, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: During the AFD discussion HGFS was moved to Host-Guest File System. Both have being redirected to VMware

HGFS

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete unsourced one-liner about software that says what it's used with, but no context about what it's used for or why it's notable. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:36, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't find this software on http://www.vmware.com/ . There are indications the software exists but I can not find any indication it is notable, no reliable sources discuss it.  --A new name 2008 (talk) 00:29, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Relooking at this, redirect to VMware is the most appropriate solution. -A new name 2008 (talk) 01:11, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 11:25, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  23:20, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete Redirect to VMware: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 23:39, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to VMware. HGFS is a VMware feature, not a separate software product.  ReverendWayne (talk) 00:45, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The coverage I found of this topic was very limited and I could find no sources that would satisfy the notability guideline. I think a redirect may be prudent in this case. Seraphim  &hearts;  01:04, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No need for own page. Jack007 (talk) 11:41, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge & Redirect to VMWare. Part of the product, not notable in and of itself, doubt there's enough info involved for the article to grow beyond a stub. --Cyber cobra (talk) 03:42, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.