Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HMDW Architects


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  03:44, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

HMDW Architects

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NCORP. Not quite enough WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 02:44, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, Companies,  and England.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  03:00, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete because, unfortunately, conservation architects rarely create anything original themselves and there's very little evidence of any significant coverage about HMDW Architects (who appear to have recently changed their name). The awards seems to be minor. The BBC article about the refurbed cinema doesn't even mention the architects. Sionk (talk) 13:02, 13 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.